Why Good Catholics are Becoming Mormon

The Author

Geoffrey Miller is a catechist, cantor, and subdiaconate candidate at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Parish in Austin, TX. He is also a Camaldolese Benedictine Oblate. As a twenty-five-year-old graduate student at Texas State University-San Marcos, he lives the evangelical counsel of poverty by force of circumstance, not by choice. When not consuming ramen noodles or writing papers, Geoffrey enjoys learning about theology, especially as it pertains to living out an authentic Catholic spirituality in the modern world. He also sports a pimped-out wheelchair. Geoffrey blogs over at http://pomeraniancatholic.blogspot.com/ as well, so check it out!

mormon-temple-San-Diego-CaliforniaFriends, it is always heartbreaking to see someone leave the Catholic Church. We should take such occasions as opportunities to examine ourselves and our own evangelical failings in the service of the Lord. That is why I want you to read the following snippet from one couple’s journey out of Catholicism and into the LDS Church, and then listen to what I have to say about reversing the tide of the millions of faithful flowing away from the Catholic Church.

“One evening we met with a friend of ours who was a deacon in the Catholic Church we attended. He and his wife freely drank wine during the evening, while their children ran around the house and made a considerable amount of noise and commotion. Later that evening Marilyn and I both found ourselves comparing their home to the home of our [Mormon] neighbors, where we always felt such an environment of peace and family unity. The Torgesens’ children would play around the house and do what children do, but we never saw them in a chaotic state as we did in the home of our dear deacon friend. We asked ourselves what type of home we wanted and came to the quick conclusion that the Torgesens’ home was what we desired for our family. Our dear friend the deacon was a wonderful person, but we simply wanted more.

“During this same evening, our deacon friend tried passionately to dissuade us from embracing the doctrines and principles we had learned from our investigation of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. He explained to us that there was no such thing as Satan, but rather an evil presence that was in opposition to that which was good. He said that there was no such thing as angels and that the Red Sea was not really parted by Moses in a literal sense, but rather it was an act of nature that allowed the Hebrews to cross. Upon hearing the deacon’s logical explanations, I was immediately reminded of the words Heavenly Father spoke to Joseph Smith in the Sacred Grove: ‘They draw near to me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me, they teach for doctrines the commandments of men, having a form of godliness, but they deny the power thereof’ (Joseph Smith–History 1:19).”

(Eric Shuster, Catholic Roots, Mormon Harvest).

catholictoldsart3Marilyn in the above story was a former Franciscan nun and a certified Catholic youth director for the Diocese of Galveston-Houston. Thus, it is not only the uninstructed and the spiritually inexperienced who are falling away from Christ and his Church. But how, then, can we account for the loss of such seemingly well-equipped souls? What is the explanation for the significant inroads being made by the LDS Church into Catholicism?

Sin is the simplest and most correct answer. And all sin traces back to a fundamental lack of trust in God, as evidenced by Adam and Eve’s decision to disobey their Lord in the Garden of Eden. Whether you take the story of Adam and Eve as historical or allegorical or perhaps some combination of the two is irrelevant—the main point is that we human beings have trust issues. And regrettably, most Catholic religious education programs, especially in regards to Scripture, approach God’s word from a perspective of distrust, suspicion, and deconstruction. Scholars pick apart the Bible and reduce it to a chaotic web of various sources and interpretive hypotheses. It’s confusing, plain and simple. People shut down. Religious educators often teach them plenty of critical thinking skills, sure, but they never teach them any solid knowledge about which to think critically. And religious educators never teach them apologetics either—only myriads of questions without definite answers. I don’t know if this tragic state has come about because of a desire for political correctness or being sensitive to other faiths or what, but it’s got to stop, because respecting others shouldn’t involve belittling one’s own self and one’s one religion.

Thomas_Aquinas_in_Stained_GlassBecause of the sad condition of Catholic religious education, many people have gotten the wrong idea that at bottom, there is nothing rational to support Christianity. And thus, they have become relativists—the truth, as they have been habitually taught to think, is always debatable and ultimately unknowable. And so, in the midst of the confusion, many have departed from classical understandings like those expounded by Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas and have turned instead to a concept of faith as mere inner conviction or belief for the sake of belief. This “fideism” (a heresy condemned by the Catholic Church at Vatican I for very good reasons) is seen on clear display in Catholic Roots, Mormon Harvest, wherein Marilyn and her husband write, “We must remember that spirituality is about faith; therefore, the component of intellectuality takes a back seat to faith. If that were not the case, then the vast majority of Christians in the world today would be unable to participate in religion.”

The key assumption underlying Marilyn’s and her husband’s above declaration is that reason and faith are in conflict, and faith must take the victory. And when one is stranded in a wasteland of baseless opinions and endless conflict and change, where does one go? To the place with the strongest witness, which for Marilyn and her husband was Mormonism. Modern people are disillusioned with words; they listen mainly to actions. Arguments against Mormonism that are centered on Joseph Smith’s polygamy and problematic teachings sound exactly like more of the same bickering one might encounter while reading a commentary about the historicity of certain passages in the Pentateuch—it’s all just meaningless noise to most people.

300px-Mormon-bookSo, what is the solution? First, prayer, that the world might again recognize the existence of objective truth. Second, profound, heroic Christian action to reach a world that has closed its ears to preaching. Third, apologetics. We Catholics must know, and teach, the reasonable arguments and the compelling evidence that undergird our faith. And what is faith? It is the decision to follow teachings and persons that have proven reliable, despite our present doubts. Faith is nothing but the free assent of the will to the clear, yet personally challenging, revelation of God. Faith must rest on the solid rock of hard fact; if it does not, it is, quite simply, not faith, but delusion.

Catholics can no longer afford to simply be knowledgable about what they believe—they must be trained and convinced experts. If you want to save souls from drifting helplessly along in the uncertain winds of this world, then you have got to start preparing yourself immediately. The soul you save may be your own. If you’re looking for a good place to start, try Catholic Answers. When the Mormons, or whoever else, come knocking at your door, you’ll be ready to explain the truth in charity. And who knows? You may even win a few converts to the Catholic Church.

Bookmark and Share
13 Comments
  • Conger M.

    My wife is LDS and one thing the Mormons have taught me, is to be well versed in scripture and to live my Catholic faith. Also that yes, I need to be well versed in scripture. I go to their services mainly as a show of unification for our son and attend mass afterwards alone.

    It was funny, last weekend they were talking about Lorenzo Snow ( one of their prophets) and one of the things he said about them becoming gods. I quickly asked them to reconcile that with Rev 22:13. I’ll admit there was some hemming and hawing over it and I was approached later and promised an answer later.

    I will say this, we must approach the LDS with love and affection. They are a good groups of folks with kind hearts (their concept of service is something to behold), but there are a lot of doctrines that run contrary to Christ’s teaching.

    • http://www.facebook.com/miller.geoffrey2.0 Geoffrey Miller

      Of course the LDS are a good group of folks with kind hearts, and there is much in their practice that is worthy of imitation. For instance, Catholics would do well to fast frequently, set aside one day a week for a family night, avoid cussing and dependency on caffeine and other substances, and do some hardcore street evangelization. I would be overjoyed if the Catholic Church replicated the LDS system of training and sending missionaries as well. The world would benefit greatly from a “temporary monastic vow” by which all able-bodied and sound-minded Catholic young people pledged their total service for two years.

      My best friend growing up was Mormon. What concerns me, Conger, is not the holiness of the LDS–they are no doubt holy. But their holiness is based on the shifting sand of bad philosophy, bad history, and bad doctrine. And once Mormons are exposed to the overwhelming evidence against them, bad things happen. My friend committed suicide, for instance, and I’m pretty sure it was because of his doubts.

      Unlike Catholicism and Christianity in general, Mormonism is not a religion based on reason and historical fact. Catholics don’t have anything to really fear from critics. In all my studies, I’ve never encountered a more coherent and intellectually compelling belief system than ours. We’re pretty much the only people out there arguing for a non-emotional, objective foundation for human life. I mean, we worship the Logos, so that only makes sense.

      Have you ever heard of John C. Wright or Jennifer Fulwiller? You should Google them and get in touch. They’re atheist converts to Catholicism, and are very well-versed in evidence-based approaches to religion. Also, John C. Wright has a conversion story that is out of this world.

      God’s blessings to you and your wife, Conger. May the Holy Spirit guide you both into ever more profound depths of Christ’s love.

  • http://soulpainter.com/ Cristóbal Almanza

    Fascinating perspective and a great read.

  • DanC

    A lot more former Catholics are becoming evangelicals or agnostics than Mormons.

    Pew reports that 31% of Americans grew up Catholic, but only 24% of adults self-identify as Catholic today, a number that would be lower if it weren’t for immigration.

    Where are these former Catholics going? Few are becoming Mormon because only 1.7% of the US population is Mormon. More likely they are going to non-demonominational mega-churches and “emerging” churches or classify themselses as “none” when asked about religion.

    As far as your diagnosis that this is falling away is due to poor education – that’s hard to accepts. At what point in the past 2000 years has the average Catholic been as educated as he/she is today? Not just in the world of secular education, but in knowledge of Catholic doctine, dogma, history, etc. You may think Catholics aren’t educated enough, but they are surely educated better today than they were 50 years ago.

    I don’t think it is educational standards that have declined so much as our culture has become increasingly consumer-driven (consumer choice is one of our highest social virtues) and people are encouraged to be individualistic and to see themselves as on a “faith journey”. Catholic preachers talk about faith journeys, too. A journey means you go somewhere and change your beliefs, right? Cultural Catholicism will probably pull many of those former Catholic back some day.

    • http://www.facebook.com/miller.geoffrey2.0 Geoffrey Miller

      In the United States, your assessment is largely correct. However, my concern is global, and in Mexico and in central and South America, Mormonism is spreading like wildfire. Please see the attached news article. Also, in my own post, I said that in this case, the couple saw Mormonism as satisfying their needs. But I maintain that the fundamental causes of their conversion are the same for those who convert to Evangelicalism or fall away entirely; indeed, I felt that my description was general.

      Also, my concern is not that Catholics aren’t getting religious education, but rather that they’re getting the wrong kind at the wrong time. Just look at the notes in the New American Bible: Revised Edition. They’re great for a college level Scripture course, but how are they supposed to benefit the average churchgoer? It’s like trying to teach calculus before algebra. When people don’t even know who the traditional authors are for the books of the Bible, what point is there in having them read essays about modern rejections of the older models of authorship? None.

      Also, I’m not sure I share your view that Catholic education in America is as strong as you make it out to be. On the recent Pew Forum basic religious knowledge test, Catholics scored at pretty much the very bottom. Google it. The facts we’ve got from empirical research would not seem to support your rather optimistic analysis of the situation.

      http://jonclark500.com/stories/stories/mormons.pdf

      • http://www.facebook.com/miller.geoffrey2.0 Geoffrey Miller

        I would further argue that a lot of religious education nowadays is hardly religious at all. The doctrines of the faith are mentioned in passing, but the focus is on critical analysis of literature and history. Which is all well and good, but you can get that sort of stuff pretty much anywhere. At Church, and in Church-run institutions, the focus should instead be on what the Church teaches and why it teaches what it teaches. I say, save the discussions of documentary hypotheses behind the composition of the Gospels and the like for another place, or at least take the emphasis off of them. Because historical-critical research is fascinating, but it’s not a substitute for teaching the faith, nor does it claim to be.

        • DanC

          It’s been a long time since I was in RE (I’m older than you), so I will take your word that it’s about critical thinking nowadays. I’d be surprised if K-12 Sunday RE incorporated “historical-critical research”. College-level classes in religion should definitely be about this kind of thing, though, and not just push simple indoctrination.

          And you never disputed my point (which I firmly believe) that education is no worse now than it was in the past. Whether it’s “good enough” or up to your standards is another question. But education in all areas of society is better than it was 50 or 60 years ago. I can’t believe religion is an exception.

          Don’t be so sure the past was better than the present. That’s a common fallacy that gloom-sayers constantly fall into.

          Let’s say education COULD be better. That still doesn’t answer why Catholics are falling away. The education is no worse than when Catholics weren’t falling away, so some other factors must be in play.

          It seems to me that the difference between 50 years ago and today is that today people feel more free to make choices about religion (so much else). They don’t accept that because they were born into the Church they must stay with her.

          It’s not the Catholics 50 years ago were better educated; it’s that back then they didn’t think of a different religion (or no religion) as an option.

          The “faith journey” paradigm is strong, and even those with strong spirits are told they are on a faith journey.

          So many of the prominent Catholic bloggers in the New Evangelization are converts. Converts not only embrace the teachings of the church more tightly than cradle Catholics (very generally speaking), they are of the seeking and conversion mindset. They are eager to tell you about their faith journey and imply you should have your own.

          • http://twitter.com/littlmon14 littlmon14

            I think, in general, our level of education that is provided in RE is higher than it was 50+ years ago. That’s not the point, nor the problem that we’re facing.

            The problem we have today, is precisely that people are taught so MUCH outside of RE, that what we teach them inside of RE is far too little. So, while we may teach them more than we used to, we do not teach them anywhere near enough as they Need to know.

            We need to preach reason-based understanding and scriptural roots of our faith. We need to teach them the writings of Aquinas and other great theologians, at the level they can understand.

            We need to teach them to Question their faith. But more than that, we need to teach them how to Find their Answers. It is in questioning that we learn. If other people ask us questions that we’re unprepared for, we need to know how to find the answer. Otherwise, anyone can provide one for us, and lead us away from the Truth.

          • http://www.facebook.com/miller.geoffrey2.0 Geoffrey Miller

            What littlmon14 said.

            I apologize that some points in my post were unclear. I should have done better in regards to expressing myself clearly. Please permit me to address your points, DanC.

            1) I’ve got my RE material right here, and yes, it very frequently brings up questions of authorship and sources, literary analysis, and encourages students to creatively engage Scripture through the lens of current events. And that’s all well and good, but it needs a much higher emphasis on doctrine.

            2) That education in all areas of society is better than 50 years ago is a myth. I’m pursuing a doctoral degree in mathematics education, and staving off the imminent collapse of the public educational system is top priority. We are dealing with the first generation to have a smaller vocabulary and knowledge-base than the previous one. I work in college readiness, and our developmental courses are taxed to the limits. Everywhere, colleges are having to dedicate members of their staff to teach incoming students how to add and subtract fractions and the like. I’m not kidding. And if you were to witness a remedial reading course, it would make your blood run cold. Around 40% of all students take remediation now.

            More students than ever before are going to college, true, but that doesn’t mean anything. High school is just stretching out into college, and people are learning the exact same stuff, except not as well as before.

            3) I’ve heard of the faith journey paradigm myself, and that is precisely what I meant by the emotivist seeking mentioned in my post. People are led by feeling; they have largely given up on using reason to find the meaning of human life. Even most atheists base their ethics on emotions, and freely admit it. Pretty much everybody, other than the Catholic Church, has given up on getting satisfying, rational answers to life’s deepest questions.

            And one last point. I am no doom-sayer. I do not pretend there was a golden age in Catholic religious education. My mother teaches adult Bible study at Our Lady’s Maronite, so observing her classes, I know better.

            I felt like you were trying to stereotype me as an over zealous convert in your comment, DanC, and I don’t appreciate that. First, I hardly count as a convert in the same way as people like, say, Scott Hahn, second, there are more zealous cradles than converts due to the numbers game, and third, we should all strive to convert our hearts to The Lord each and every day.

  • DanC

    Whoops, misspelled non-denominational

    Also Pew report is at religions.pewforum.org/reports

  • I Love the Church

    I happened upon this article while at ACNM looking at something else… Mormonism seems to be all the rage these days.

    What struck me as I read the excerpt from Schuster’s book – right in the heart – was that these reasons that Marilyn and Eric were giving for leaving the Church were merely superficial. Leaving the Church because one family drinks wine and their children are boistrous? Absurd. Fortunately, the Church herself, while made up of imperfect sinners, is sinless and holy.

    I think the crux of their departure was that, plainly and simply, they had ceased to believe that Jesus Christ is truly present in the Holy Eucharist – Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity. If you believe in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist, and that Jesus truly comes to us each time the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is celebrated – and unites Himself to us, you would NEVER EVER leave the Church, no matter how sinful Her members. Mere people – we sinners – have been trying to wreck the Church since Day 1… and fortunately we know that Christ is the Victor! The Holy Spirit is with the Church – just as Jesus promised us.

    Yes, it is a matter of catechesis – and I grant that many people are very poorly catechized… however, it is first a matter of evangelization – and the need for a true, real and personal encounter with the person of Jesus Christ. If you fall in love with Him, and receive Him in the Eucharist, and believe that He is truly present – none of the small stuff really matters, and we can forgive and pray for clergy, religious and laity who, being human, occasionally fall short and sin.

    Providential that I should see this on Holy Thursday – the day the priesthood was instituted, and the Holy Eucharist as well. Let us pray fervently and make sacrifices for Our Holy Father Francis, for bishops, priests, deacons, religious and all laity – that they {I really mean WE! for we all are part of the mystical body of Christ} would never efface or defame our Mother the Church, Christ’s spotless bride, by our words or actions. But when we do, let us have recourse to the mercy of God. By living our faith vibrantly we will be a witness.

    And let us pray for misguided souls who leave the Church for insignificant reasons, and pray that ultimately they will have the grace to see that Jesus is truly present – and that His Church, one, holy, Catholic and apostolic, is the true Church. Others have a part of the truth, but only the Catholic Church has the fullness.

    • jdzondo

      Amen!

  • Bishop Lee

    The simple truth is that your friend prayed and received an answer that the LDS church is God’s restored church on the earth. The reason that the book of Mormon is on the earth, is because the simple plain truths of the gospel were lost and distorted by fallible men who declared themselves infallible. There was one perfect man, Jesus Christ.

    Any sincere person who sincerely reads the Book of Mormon and prays to know if it is true can receive an answer from God. Was the book written by a 22 year old boy, or translated by a prophet of God?

    There is a being we know as Satan (which come from the root word for “tempter”). Satan is not his name, it is his roll. His real name is Lucifer. Just as he guided our first parents to chose against our Heavenly Father’s directions he works to weave his webs today.

    Although I am a Bishop and people trust me and confide in me, I pray that their testimonies are based on Jesus Christ. Knowing that I am imperfect, I would hate to see them fall away from Christ’s church because of something I did, said, or was rumored to have done. God Lives. He loves His Children and guides them through prophets as he did in times past. You may know of this for yourself through reading the Book of Mormon, or even listening to the words of His living prophet and then sincerely asking God the Eternal Father in the Name if Jesus Christ and he will manifest the truth to you, as he did these people. And when he does, it doesn’t matter if you have been catholic for 27generations, you follow truth as God manifests it to you.

Recommend this Post